Easy peasy STATA-like marginal effects with R
Functional peace of mind
Why I find tidyeval useful
tidyr::spread() and dplyr::rename_at() in action
Introducing brotools
Lesser known dplyr 0.7* tricks
Lesser known dplyr tricks
Lesser known purrr tricks
Make ggplot2 purrr
Functional programming and unit testing for data munging with R available on Leanpub
How to use jailbreakr
My free book has a cover!
Work on lists of datasets instead of individual datasets by using functional programming
Method of Simulated Moments with R
New website!
Nonlinear Gmm with R - Example with a logistic regression
Simulated Maximum Likelihood with R
Bootstrapping standard errors for difference-in-differences estimation with R
Careful with tryCatch
Data frame columns as arguments to dplyr functions
Export R output to a file
I've started writing a 'book': Functional programming and unit testing for data munging with R
Introduction to programming econometrics with R
Merge a list of datasets together
Object Oriented Programming with R: An example with a Cournot duopoly
R, R with Atlas, R with OpenBLAS and Revolution R Open: which is fastest?
Read a lot of datasets at once with R
Unit testing with R
Update to Introduction to programming econometrics with R
Using R as a Computer Algebra System with Ryacas

Model interpretation is essential in the social sciences. If one wants to know the effect of variable `x`

on the dependent variable `y`

, marginal effects are an easy way to get the answer. STATA includes a `margins`

command that has been ported to R by Thomas J. Leeper of the London School of Economics and Political Science. You can find the source code of the package on github. In this short blog post, I demo some of the functionality of `margins`

.

First, let’s load some packages:

```
library(ggplot2)
library(tibble)
library(broom)
library(margins)
library(Ecdat)
```

As an example, we are going to use the `Participation`

data from the `Ecdat`

package:

`data(Participation)`

`?Participation`

```
Labor Force Participation
Description
a cross-section
number of observations : 872
observation : individuals
country : Switzerland
Usage
data(Participation)
Format
A dataframe containing :
lfp
labour force participation ?
lnnlinc
the log of nonlabour income
age
age in years divided by 10
educ
years of formal education
nyc
the number of young children (younger than 7)
noc
number of older children
foreign
foreigner ?
Source
Gerfin, Michael (1996) “Parametric and semiparametric estimation of the binary response”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(3), 321-340.
References
Davidson, R. and James G. MacKinnon (2004) Econometric Theory and Methods, New York, Oxford University Press, http://www.econ.queensu.ca/ETM/, chapter 11.
Journal of Applied Econometrics data archive : http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/jae/.
```

The variable of interest is `lfp`

: whether the individual participates in the labour force or not. To know which variables are relevant in the decision to participate in the labour force, one could estimate a logit model, using `glm()`

.

`logit_participation = glm(lfp ~ ., data = Participation, family = "binomial")`

Now that we ran the regression, we can take a look at the results. I like to use `broom::tidy()`

to look at the results of regressions, as `tidy()`

returns a nice `data.frame`

, but you could use `summary()`

if you’re only interested in reading the output:

`tidy(logit_participation)`

```
## term estimate std.error statistic p.value
## 1 (Intercept) 10.37434616 2.16685216 4.7877499 1.686617e-06
## 2 lnnlinc -0.81504064 0.20550116 -3.9661122 7.305449e-05
## 3 age -0.51032975 0.09051783 -5.6378920 1.721444e-08
## 4 educ 0.03172803 0.02903580 1.0927211 2.745163e-01
## 5 nyc -1.33072362 0.18017027 -7.3859224 1.514000e-13
## 6 noc -0.02198573 0.07376636 -0.2980454 7.656685e-01
## 7 foreignyes 1.31040497 0.19975784 6.5599678 5.381941e-11
```

From the results above, one can only interpret the sign of the coefficients. To know how much a variable influences the labour force participation, one has to use `margins()`

:

`effects_logit_participation = margins(logit_participation) `

```
## Warning in warn_for_weights(model): 'weights' used in model estimation are
## currently ignored!
```

`print(effects_logit_participation)`

`## Average marginal effects`

`## glm(formula = lfp ~ ., family = "binomial", data = Participation)`

```
## lnnlinc age educ nyc noc foreignyes
## -0.1699 -0.1064 0.006616 -0.2775 -0.004584 0.2834
```

Using `summary()`

on the object returned by `margins()`

provides more details:

`summary(effects_logit_participation)`

```
## factor AME SE z p lower upper
## age -0.1064 0.0176 -6.0494 0.0000 -0.1409 -0.0719
## educ 0.0066 0.0060 1.0955 0.2733 -0.0052 0.0185
## foreignyes 0.2834 0.0399 7.1102 0.0000 0.2053 0.3615
## lnnlinc -0.1699 0.0415 -4.0994 0.0000 -0.2512 -0.0887
## noc -0.0046 0.0154 -0.2981 0.7656 -0.0347 0.0256
## nyc -0.2775 0.0333 -8.3433 0.0000 -0.3426 -0.2123
```

And it is also possible to plot the effects with base graphics:

`plot(effects_logit_participation)`

This uses the basic R plotting capabilities, which is useful because it is a simple call to the function `plot()`

but if you’ve been using `ggplot2`

and want this graph to have the same look as the others made with `ggplot2`

you first need to save the summary in a variable. Let’s overwrite this `effects_logit_participation`

variable with its summary:

`effects_logit_participation = summary(effects_logit_participation)`

And now it is possible to use `ggplot2`

to create the same plot:

```
ggplot(data = effects_logit_participation) +
geom_point(aes(factor, AME)) +
geom_errorbar(aes(x = factor, ymin = lower, ymax = upper)) +
geom_hline(yintercept = 0) +
theme_minimal() +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45))
```

So an infinitesimal increase, in say, non-labour income (`lnnlinc`

) of 0.001 is associated with a decrease of the probability of labour force participation by 0.001*17 percentage points.

You can also extract the marginal effects of a single variable, with `dydx()`

:

`head(dydx(Participation, logit_participation, "lnnlinc"))`

```
## dydx_lnnlinc
## 1 -0.15667764
## 2 -0.20014487
## 3 -0.18495109
## 4 -0.05377262
## 5 -0.18710476
## 6 -0.19586986
```

Which makes it possible to extract the effects for a list of individuals that you can create yourself:

```
my_subjects = tribble(
~lfp, ~lnnlinc, ~age, ~educ, ~nyc, ~noc, ~foreign,
"yes", 10.780, 7.0, 4, 1, 1, "yes",
"no", 1.30, 9.0, 1, 4, 1, "yes"
)
dydx(my_subjects, logit_participation, "lnnlinc")
```

```
## dydx_lnnlinc
## 1 -0.09228119
## 2 -0.17953451
```

I used the `tribble()`

function from the `tibble`

package to create this test data set, row by row. Then, using `dydx()`

, I get the marginal effect of variable `lnnlinc`

for these two individuals. No doubt that this package will be a huge help convincing more social scientists to try out R and make a potential transition from STATA easier.